Higher OSHA Fines Loom For GHS Label Violations

Labeling options for facilities help cut complexity of compliance with Globally Harmonized System requirements, as well as making production safer.

By Colwin Chan

With the deadlines for Globally Harmonized System (GHS) label compliance now past for chemical manufacturers, distributors, and end users, OSHA has some stiff fines planned for those not yet with the program. Facilities that house chemicals that fall under these compliance requirements should examine this issue now to ensure they move to compliance soon and avoid fines.

According to Mark Howell, owner of Howell Safety and Training Solutions, a safety and risk management consulting company, for any stragglers who are not GHS label compliant, OSHA fines and penalties were expected to go up 80% during the summer of 2016. By August 1, the maximum fine was expected to rise from $7,000 per violation to $12,600 per violation, and for more serious issues from $70,000 to $127,000 per violation.Globally Harmonized System

End users, who may not yet be fully GHS label compliant after the most recent June 1, 2016 deadline, or who may want to streamline their compliance process, will find that easy GHS labeling options can cut the complexity as well as make production safer. For end users, GHS compliance is required for chemical formulations purchased in bulk containers for cost savings, such as barrels of industrial cleaner that are transferred to smaller “down-packed” containers, such as spray bottles, for portable use.

Containers requiring GHS compliant labeling can vary in size from 55-gallon drums down to small test vials. In an industrial setting, chemical formulations that could require GHS labeling range from industrial primers, coatings, and sealants to lubricants, greases, cutting oils, and rust removers to acid, alkaline, and solvent based cleaners to degreasers, surfactants, disinfectants, and sanitizers.

Compliant In Short Timeline

When a large metal supply service center in Ohio sought GHS label compliance for “down-packed” secondary container labeling, it proactively sought a solution.

According to David Heberling, a quality metallurgist and safety manager at this metal service center, down-packing was necessary from 55-gal drums to smaller containers with spray nozzles. The applications involve spraying oils, solvents, and lubricants onto product surfaces and into production line equipment that produces flat-rolled steel, in coils and cut lengths.

Heberling chose a type of GHS labels that are industrial-grade and designed to be chemical-resistant, tear-resistant, abrasion-resistant, and constructed with a marine-grade adhesive that passes a 90-day seawater submersion adhesion test. To accompany the new labeling system, he implemented the use of free label-printing software that is used to create on-demand labels.

The software includes the pictograms and GHS compliant statements needed for GHS labeling; allows customizable text; insertion of company logo or other images; generation of 18 types of barcodes; and a sequential numbering feature to add lot numbers or other variable data. “What I really needed was the chemical name, hazards, pictograms, and precautions for internal company use,” says Heberling. “I like that when I entered the CAS number for the main chemical ingredient from the Safety Data Sheet, the software filled these in and allowed me to modify them to suit our situation as appropriate. Most of the work was done for me.”

No download is required since the software operates from a website, and GHS, HMIS, and NFPA labels can be securely saved online or to a computer. The software is also capable of printing other safety labels such as OSHA, ANSI, and DOT labels.

“The ability to convey needed GHS label info clearly, as well as combine it with other systems like HMIS and NFPA can be helpful when hybrid systems are required,” says consultant Howell. “Software with modifiable templates allows you to quickly create GHS labels for your specific product, in the quantities you need, at the time you need them.”

According to Heberling, relying on the software along with the appropriate labels enabled his metal supply service center to become GHS compliant rapidly.

“Once we had the labels, we complied with GHS requirements within a couple of hours,” says Heberling. “I printed what we needed on a desktop printer, and we affixed the labels to painted secondary containers with spray nozzles at the production lines. What initially looked like a big project actually turned out to be quite simple.”

Since then the GHS-compliant labels have passed a corporate audit, while also improving the safety of the production lines and employees.

“While GHS label compliance was mandatory, so was passing all safety audits,” says Heberling. “The real bottom line, however, is that becoming GHS label compliant has improved our safety at the production lines. Now we are clearly displaying chemical data to prevent mistakes of misidentification, along with other necessary information.”

Howell agrees that universal GHS label compliance will improve safety by minimizing the risk of chemical misidentification and mishandling along the entire supply chain — from manufacturer to end user, both domestically and internationally.

“Keep in mind, however, that GHS labeling falls under a United Nations standard that OSHA follows, so GHS updates will now occur about every four years,” he says. “So the entire supply chain will want to work with a GHS label provider and perhaps a consultant that will keep them up to date with these changes.”

Chan is the senior product manager for Avery Safety & Facilities Solutions, a division of the Avery Products Corporation. He spearheads the development of labeling and identification products for GHS, safety, and industrial needs in the workplace.