Big Office Buildings Tops In Adopting Green Practices | Facility Executive - Creating Intelligent Buildings

There is a significant gap between large and small office buildings in achieving sustainability certification, according to the newest Green Building Adoption Index by CBRE Group, Inc. and Maastricht University.


https://facilityexecutive.com/2015/07/big-office-buildings-tops-in-adopting-green-practices/
There is a significant gap between large and small office buildings in achieving sustainability certification, according to the newest Green Building Adoption Index by CBRE Group, Inc. and Maastricht University.
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Big Office Buildings Tops In Adopting Green Practices

Big Office Buildings Tops In Adopting Green Practices | Facility Executive - Creating Intelligent Buildings

There’s a significant gap between large and small office buildings in achieving sustainability certification, according to a new study by CBRE Group, Inc. and Maastricht University.

The 2015 Green Building Adoption Index, a joint project of CBRE and Maastricht, found that 62.1% of office buildings in the U.S. greater than 500,000 square feet are considered “green” (holding either an EPA ENERGY STAR label, U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) full-building LEED certification, or both). In contrast, only 4.5% of all U.S. office buildings less than 100,000 square feet qualified as green.

“Our 2015 study confirmed that green building adoption has been primarily a big building, first-tier city phenomenon,” said David Pogue, CBRE’s global director of corporate responsibility. “It would appear that many smaller buildings in the majority of large markets still have an opportunity to be ‘best in class’ among their peer set by achieving these certifications.”

Green-Building-Adoption-Index
Credit: CBRE and Maastricht University

Minneapolis led the city ranking for the second consecutive year, with 70.4% of all office space currently qualified as green, down from 77% in 2014. San Francisco, again in second place, significantly closed the gap and now boasts a 70% green market, up from 67.2% in 2014. Chicago, at 63.4%, was third, while Atlanta (57.8%) and Houston (52.9%) swapped positions at fourth and fifth. The top 10 cities on the 2014 list all retained a place on the 2015 list.

The overall results of the study show that the uptake of green building practices in the 30 largest U.S. cities continues to be significant, but that the growth is slowing. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2014, 13.1% of the commercial building stock had an ENERGY STAR label, LEED certification, or both, compared to 13.8% at the end of 2013. Measured by size, the amount of certified commercial space also decreased from 39.3% in 2013 to 38.7% at the end of 2014.

“This decrease does not imply that buildings are starting to perform worse than before. Rather, it reflects the fact that only a certain fraction of the building stock can obtain a green or energy-efficiency certification,” said Dr. Nils Kok, associate professor in Finance and Real Estate, Maastricht University (NL). “Additionally, it appears that some of the buildings that were previously certified did not renew their certification in 2014. This does not necessarily mean that the energy use of these buildings has changed, but that some owners and managers choose not to spend the time or expense to reapply for certification every year.”

Executed in close collaboration with the USGBC and CBRE Research, this is the second release of the annual Green Building Adoption Index. Based on a rigorous methodology, the Index shows the growth of ENERGY STAR- and LEED-certified space for the 30 largest U.S. office markets, both in aggregate and in individual markets, over the previous 10 years.

Suggested Links:

You Might Like:

LEAVE A REPLY