Inappropriate Repairs for Historic Stone Masonry

As holds the principle of bioethics, so should the approach to treating historic stone: “First, do no harm.”

stone masonry
Blistering waterproof coating.

By Elizabeth A. Hnatiw and Christopher M. DeRosa

As holds the principle of bioethics, so should the approach to treating historic stone: “First, do no harm.” If the degree of deterioration does little to detract from the architectural character of the building or to call into question its structural stability or performance, no repair may be needed.

Too often, application of a “protective” waterproof coating, aimed at preventing hypothetical moisture-related deterioration, has the unintended effect of sealing moisture inside the masonry surface and leading, in many cases, to real and irreversible damage. Stone masonry buildings of traditional construction were designed to “breathe;” to be permeable to air and moisture, allowing water to leave the wall assembly through the natural process of evaporation. Introducing impervious coatings and vapor barriers disrupts the balance of moisture across the building envelope, which can result in dire consequences for the stone, at both a macro- and micro-structural level.

stone masonry
Deteriorated face-pointed mortar.

As a shortcut to address deteriorated mortar joints, a thin layer of mortar is sometimes added without first removing the existing mortar to the appropriate depth. While quicker and cheaper than full repointing, face-pointing is inadvisable, as it does not provide suitable stability and tends to crumble out of the joint.

Introduction of pointing mortars of incorrect composition may restrain the natural expansion and contraction of stone masonry subjected to moisture absorption and drastic temperature swing cycles, leading to cracking and spalling.

stone masonry
Incorrect use of sealant. (All photos: Hoffmann Architects, Inc.)

Faulty patching mortars and ill-conceived pinning methods may have similar detrimental consequences. Even stone cleaning, which sounds innocuous enough, is fraught with hazards, as using abrasive or chemically incompatible cleaning methods can abrade or otherwise damage the stone surface.

Elizabeth A. Campbell, AIA LEED AP BD+C is Project Architect with Hoffmann Architects, Inc., an architecture and engineering firm specializing in the rehabilitation of building exteriors. She develops historic stone restoration strategies that combine material science and preservation. Christopher M. DeRosa, AIA, PE, LEED Green Associate, Project Architect with Hoffmann Architects, is experienced in designing stone cleaning and repair programs for traditional masonry buildings.

Building Design & Construction, Building Envelope, Economic Development, Facilities Management, FacilityBlog, Featured

architecture, Exteriors, Historic buildings, historic stone, Historic-Preservation, Hoffmann Architects, Maintenance, stone masonry buildings, TOTM: Building Envelope & Exteriors

Sponsored Content
Featured Video

Webinars, Podcasts & Videos

Under the care of ABM, systems perform, businesses prosper, and occupants thrive.

Where Others See a Facility, We See Possibility

Under the care of ABM, systems perform, businesses prosper, and occupants thrive.

crime scene

Listen Now: What To Do When Your Facility Becomes A Crime Scene

A business continuity analyst discusses steps FM teams need to consider after a crime has been committed in their buildings.

Facilities Teams, ARC Facilities Webinar

Did You Miss Our “Solving The Hidden Assets Challenge” Webinar?

Hidden assets can be a challenge for facilities teams. View this free video webinar on demand and learn how your team can retain knowledge and streamline operations.

Receive the latest articles in your inbox

Share to...